Aug, 08, 2012 By Vikram Murarka 0 comments
Forex risk management is a frustrating experience for most companies. There seem to be a thousand things that can go wrong at any time - the economy, the market, the forecasts, the regulations, the shipment and payment dates - and generally they do seem to go wrong all together, all the time, every time. If by any chance, or maybe by design, there is profit in any one year, it does not seem to last. Losses, when they inevitably come, tend to wipe out the profits of earlier years. Little wonder that most companies tend to give up on forex risk management in disgust, saying, "Forex is not our business!"
We disagree. Forex is very much the business of every importer and exporter. And, tackled with a common sense business approach, it can even add to the bottomline instead of constantly subtracting from it. But, that is material for another article. In this article, we shall look at how companies generally deal with forex risk management, and what problems they face.
The most common way to deal with forex risk, of course, is to wish it away, to do nothing. But sadly, as the School of Hard Knocks has taught all of us, avoiding a problem, turning a blind eye to it never works in the long run.
The second most common way to deal with the issue is to hedge away the forex risk, by closing the original exposure or position straight away, usually with a forward contract, so that the risk is eliminated. This is a simplistic solution, commonly prescribed by textbooks and "purists" who espouse the belief that "forex is not your business." The implicit suggestion is that the company is incapable of managing forex risk.
The problem with this method is that although risk is eliminated no doubt, one ends up sacrificing all potential profit as well. An associated problem with this method is that it is easy to adopt for the exporter who earns the forward premium, but is difficult for the importer who has to pay the same premium.
A variation to this method is to hedge sometimes and not to hedge at other times, based on the available market forecasts.
The problem with this method is that one doesn't know whether the forecast is going to be right or wrong. One cannot have an idea of the chances of success. In case the forecast is prepared by the internal risk management team of the company, there is an additional risk of the forecast turning out to be biased. For instance, there's a danger that an importer will be biased towards a weaker Dollar while an exporter would say that the Dollar is going to rise. In this, it helps to take a forecast from an external, professional forecaster, whose work is considered reliable. For instance, 72% of our forecasts are reliable.
The third, much less common way to hedge against forex risk is to use Options as the hedging tool, rather than the forward contract. This is a better way, no doubt, but it is still not the best way. The benefit of course, is that Options allow the company to partake of potential profit if the market moves in its favour, while eliminating the risk of an unfavourable move. It is, in a manner, the best of both worlds. The sad part is that options tend to be costly and are profitable only in trending markets. Further, most companies, especially exporters (who are used to receiving forward premium) do not have a hedging cost budget, which would enable them to pay the premium for buying options.
Very well, we've pointed out the flaws in all the common risk management methods. Does this mean there's no hope for beleaguered company managements? Thankfully, there is definitely a way out, and it works. In fact, it has worked for the last six years in various market conditions. We call it the KSHITIJ Hedging Method. It is built on common sense business principles and has been formulated after years of experience and trial and error.
Most importantly, it rejects the fatalistic belief that "forex is not my business." Instead we believe that forex is very much the business of every importer and exporter. And, there is no business issue that cannot be dealt with efficiently if approached proactively. The KSHITIJ Hedging Method is built on the belief that something proper can definitely be done in forex risk management, that the effort is not destined for failure.
In our Oct-24 report (01-Oct-24, US10Yr @ 3.79%), we had said that in contrast with history, there were no immediate signs of a US recession and the earlier it could set in might be in Jan-Mar 2025, or maybe even later. We also favored just a slowdown, or at most a shallow recession. In accordance with this, the US data in October has been mixed to strong …. Read More
In our Oct-24 report (3-Oct-24, Brent $74.98), we had expected Brent to trade within $80-60 in the coming months. We had laid out a possibility of downside extension to $55-50 in case of a US recession in the Jan-Mar’25 quarter. Else a shallow recession or slowdown could limit the downside to $60. Brent remained above the Sep-24 low of $68.68 through Oct-24 trading within the broad $81.16-69.91 region, in line with our broader mentioned range of $80-60. … Read More
After Donald Trump’s victory in the US elections, will the Dollar Index fall in the coming months aiding Euro strength? Or will aggressive rate cuts by the ECB and political uncertainity in Germany and France continue to put downside pressure on the Euro? ……. Read More
Our November ’24 Monthly Dollar-Rupee Forecast is now available. To order a PAID copy, please click here and take a trial of our service.
Our November ’24 Dollar Rupee Monthly Forecast is now available. To order a PAID copy, please click here and take a trial of our service.